Skip to content →

Twitter Threads: on Open Source

“Open Source” means nothing if there is no one that audits your code.

It tends to become a smokescreen that signals “Nothing wrong here! Open Source, you know!”
It’s like saying a huge warehouse full of clocks is “safe” because everyone can check them all.

If there’s one in the centre with a bomb attached, there is no way to find it until it’s too late.
Most users have no way to check the code due to lack of relevant skills: they still need to rely on experts, whose time is precious. So it comes back to trust.
The onus of creating transparency is on the creator, not the community.

If you pump out unannotated code “because annotating is boring”, then you are still creating a black box by not making your code auditable as easy as it could be.
It’s my guess that 95% of all crypto projects suffer from this, either conciously or unconciously.

Bas Wisselink
Follow me

Bas Wisselink

Freelance trainer and speaker at Blockchain Workspace
Bas Wisselink is a freelance writer, public speaker and trainer. He is a founder of Blockchain Workspace. His expertise is in education, training and presentation skills.
Bas Wisselink
Follow me

Also published on Medium.

Published in Twitter Threads